By Aaron


2013-10-18 13:21:05 8 Comments

Why are you "On a train" yet "In a car" when you are inside both vehicles?

"On a bike" makes sense but "On a plane" seems wrong as you are actually inside the plane rather than on it.

2 comments

@John Lawler 2013-10-18 16:53:26

Generally speaking, the metaphoric senses of get on and get in follow dimensionality:

  • the object of on is a Surface, i.e, an object with 2 dimensions, or the surface of a 3-D object
  • the object of in is a Container, i.e, a bounded 2-D or 3-D object

In terms of conveyances,

  • humans get on a raft, a horse, a bicycle, a sled, a wagon, a skateboard, a surfboard
  • humans get in a car, a boat, a ship, a railroad car, a trolley, a bus, an airplane

This much is predictable.

The problem arises with scheduled public conveyances; in that case only,
a human who gets in the conveyance physically
also is on the roster of passengers metaphorically
(on the roster is a 2-D "page/paper" metaphor).

So one can be said to get on the bus, the plane, the train, the trolley; but not the taxi.

@Bradd Szonye 2013-10-18 20:56:21

I think it's more common to get on a boat, and aircraft terminology is largely borrowed from nautical, but otherwise I agree, this sounds right.

@John Lawler 2013-10-20 21:32:19

You get on a large vessel, but that's because everything is flat, and it's a scheduled conveyance (whether public or not), so you're on the list. You get in a rowboat, a canoe, or a kayak, however.

@Dan Bron 2016-06-29 14:13:23

I think we get on a bus for the same reason we get on a skateboard: because during the act of boarding at least, and sometimes even during the ride, we are standing (on a surface which holds us up). When we get in a car, we do so by immediately and inevitably sitting (in seat which contains our body)

@John Lawler 2016-06-29 14:33:54

Good point. The posture of the agent may well make a difference; stand is a bedrock human reference, for instance.

@Dan Bron 2016-06-30 01:06:17

@JohnLawler You've pointed me to that paper before, and I've read it, and I found it fascinating. I even used it to support an argument over on Linguistics.SE!

@user105360 2018-11-14 18:46:08

Still a +1, but please expand upon "on a roster." If one refers to a roster as a physical/virtual page/surface, then yes, but a roster as a set (list, collection, etc) uses "in."

@John Lawler 2018-11-14 19:45:51

No, a roster is a list on paper. Roster may refer to the set of names on the list, but a roster is a physical thing at base, and since it refers to writing, it's two-dimensional. The fact is that metaphors like list and roster can be abstracted and often are confused with their abstract (set-theoretic or logical) avatars -- but they're always physical or physiological because that's all that humans really share.

@Vilmar 2013-10-18 13:34:09

I remember different opinions on that:

  • When you get in the car, you get directly into your seat, while on public transport you have to walk to it (plane, train, bus).

  • You can stand up and walk around in public transport, thus the "on".

  • Public transport is "elevated", you need to go up a bit to get on it (stairs, platform).

  • "car" deriving from "carriage", a vehicle mounted with a car. That also explains why we get on the train, but in the train car.

Related Questions

Sponsored Content

4 Answered Questions

2 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Connotation behind "what's wrong with you?"

  • 2018-06-30 08:46:20
  • MAT
  • 62 View
  • 0 Score
  • 2 Answer
  • Tags:   expressions

5 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Why do you "let out the clutch" when you technically "engage" it?

3 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] "in a word" vs "in a sentence"

8 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] What's the verdict on "sooner than later"?

Sponsored Content