2019-01-06 22:37:15 8 Comments

While studying calculus, I encountered the following statement: "Given a function $f(x)$ with $f'(x_0)\neq 0$, such that $f$ has an inverse in some neighborhood of $x_0$, and such that $f$ is continuous on said neighborhood, then $f^{-1}$ has a derivative at $f(x_0)$ given by: $${f^{-1}}'(x_0)=\frac{1}{f'(x_0)}$$

My questions is - why does $f$ have to be continuous on a **whole neighborhood** of $x_0$ and not just at $x_0$? Is there some known counter-example for that?

### Related Questions

#### Sponsored Content

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Existence of a function whose derivative of inverse equals the inverse of the derivative

**2016-06-17 08:28:21****Cleggstein****203**View**5**Score**1**Answer- Tags: derivatives power-series inverse-function

#### 2 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Inverse Function like theorem for monotoncity

**2018-12-05 19:58:29****henceproved****35**View**0**Score**2**Answer- Tags: calculus

#### 3 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] If the derivative exists when $x$ approaches a point, is $f$ differentiable at that point?

**2018-01-30 11:49:59****Alon Weissfeld****73**View**2**Score**3**Answer- Tags: calculus limits derivatives

#### 2 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Differentiable bijection $f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ with nonzero derivative whose inverse is not differentiable

**2017-06-26 16:25:52****Matija Sreckovic****1672**View**8**Score**2**Answer- Tags: real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function inverse-function-theorem

#### 0 Answered Questions

### derivative of a inverse function

**2017-10-14 15:51:52****Muskan Dalal****35**View**0**Score**0**Answer- Tags: differential inverse-function

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Derivative has finite, unequal left and right limits at a point; is the function non-differentiable at this point?

**2015-04-24 10:47:34****Stromael****190**View**4**Score**1**Answer- Tags: calculus real-analysis

#### 0 Answered Questions

### Using the chain rule to find the derivative of the inverse of a function

**2017-01-13 13:55:01****la flaca****177**View**2**Score**0**Answer- Tags: multivariable-calculus derivatives inverse-function jacobian

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Derivative of the inverse of exponential function a^x, with a>0 and a≠1

**2016-01-10 20:45:10****user304152****86**View**1**Score**1**Answer- Tags: derivatives logarithms exponential-function inverse-function

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Two function issues (Inverse and behavior)

**2015-11-20 19:09:19****Billy McGeen****67**View**1**Score**1**Answer- Tags: real-analysis monotone-functions inverse-function

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Existance of $n$-th derivative at $x_0$ and continuity at $x_0$

**2013-02-20 15:21:14****Scis****276**View**2**Score**1**Answer- Tags: calculus

## 4 comments

## @Mindlack 2019-01-06 22:51:34

I think that as long as $f^{-1}$ is well-defined on a neighborhood of $f(x_0)$, and continuous at $f(x_0)$, there is no issue.

Indeed, $f(f^{-1}(f(x_0)+h))=f(x_0)+h$ so $h=f(f^{-1}(f(x_0)+h))-f(x_0) \sim f’(x_0)(f^{-1}(f(x_0)+h)-x_0)$, and the conclusion (of differentiability and value of the derivative) follows.

## @jmerry 2019-01-06 22:50:36

The suggestion in the title isn't how it'll work. Instead of having an inverse that doesn't have a derivative, we'll fail to have a continuous inverse. Also, the required condition for the theorem isn't just that $f$ is continuous on an interval - it's that $f'$ is continuous on an interval around the key point.

Example: $f(x)=\begin{cases}x+2x^2\sin\frac 1x&x\neq 0\\0&x = 0\end{cases}$. This $f$ is differentiable everywhere, with derivative $1$ at zero, but it doesn't have an inverse in any neighborhood of zero. Why? Because it isn't monotone on any neighborhood of zero. We have $f'(x)=1+4x\sin\frac1x-2\cos\frac1x$ for $x\neq 0$, which is negative whenever $\frac1x\equiv 0\mod 2\pi$. We can find a one-sided inverse $g$ with $f(g(x))=x$, but this $g$ will necessarily have infinitely many jump discontinuities near zero.

The calculation of the derivative of $f^{-1}$ is just an application of the chain rule. The real meat of the inverse function theorem is the existence of a differentiable inverse.

## @Ran Kiri 2019-01-06 23:01:57

Yes I can see it now. Thank you very much!

## @Milo Brandt 2019-01-06 22:58:48

The continuity condition is not necessary. It's enough that $f$ be injective on some neighborhood. This said, if your function has a sequence of jump discontinuities near $x_0$, you might have that there is no open interval $U$ around $x_0$ for which $f(U)$ is also an interval. This means that $f^{-1}$ might be defined on a strange domain, though we can still

technicallydifferentiate it to get the desired result.Formally, the statement you would need to prove is the following:

One you have this statement, you can apply it to a pair where we take $g=f^{-1}$. Note that we can make this work even if $f$ isn't defined on an interval around $x_0$ - it's okay as long as we have enough points to define the relevant limit towards $x_0$.

Granted, it is a bit unusual to talk about derivatives on sets that aren't open, but there's no technical limitations preventing it, though the proof of the suggested lemma is a pain.

## @Henno Brandsma 2019-01-06 22:51:19

First off, any function has an inverse "at $x_0$" because we just assign $f(x_0)$ the value $x_0$; it's really meaningless to talk at an inverse existing at a point. We need a whole neighbourhood because then we can use the derivative, which is defined by a limit, so we must be able to "approach" $x_0$ arbitarily closely.