2019-03-08 21:58:51 8 Comments

Is there a base $b$ such that:

$$\log_b x = x $$

(The only one that comes to mind would be the *invalid* case of $\log_1 1 = 1 $.)

I'm fairly certain the answer is *no*, but I can't find a clear justification for it.

(I don't have a strong mathematical background so an answer with the intuition would be much more helpful than any complex theorem proof.)

### Related Questions

#### Sponsored Content

#### 2 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Geometric interpretation of the Logarithm (in $\mathbb{R}$)

**2019-02-09 08:23:05****MASL****290**View**13**Score**2**Answer- Tags: geometry logarithms projective-geometry discrete-logarithms cross-ratio

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Logarithm Identity

**2018-09-26 18:55:26****Cody****33**View**1**Score**1**Answer- Tags: logarithms

#### 9 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Underlying Reason For Taking Log Base 10

**2018-02-22 07:47:00****Y.M.80****4731**View**31**Score**9**Answer- Tags: algebra-precalculus logarithms exponentiation

#### 5 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] The base of a logarithm

**2018-02-01 17:42:44****Rijndael****63**View**0**Score**5**Answer- Tags: logarithms

#### 8 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Intuition behind logarithm change of base

**2017-12-28 02:27:13****Max****1050**View**12**Score**8**Answer- Tags: algebra-precalculus logarithms intuition

#### 1 Answered Questions

### Integral of $b[x]^{l[x]} = p[x]$

**2017-09-07 10:15:42****CorvinoDiNevarca****62**View**1**Score**1**Answer- Tags: integration derivatives logarithms

#### 5 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Is the natural logarithm actually unique as a multiplier?

**2016-04-29 14:51:57****user301988****462**View**2**Score**5**Answer- Tags: calculus logarithms exponential-function

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] How to determine periodicity of complex log in different bases?

**2012-03-07 21:10:11****wjl****625**View**4**Score**1**Answer- Tags: complex-numbers logarithms periodic-functions multivalued-functions

#### 3 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Logarithm base transformation

**2014-05-04 17:53:48****Transcendental****199**View**3**Score**3**Answer- Tags: logarithms

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Problems simplifying logarithmic expressions

**2012-10-15 19:15:54****Peter****523**View**1**Score**1**Answer- Tags: logarithms

## 7 comments

## @enedil 2019-03-08 23:17:54

No, it can't. For any base $b$, there is some real constant $C$, s.t. $$ \log_b x = C \ln x $$ If it were that this logarithm is identity function, then natural logarithm would be just $x/C$, which is clearly false.

## @Adam 2019-03-09 16:05:00

If

`log_b X = C ln x`

and`log_b`

is the identity function, then`log_b x = x = C ln x`

==>`ln x = x/C`

.## @R.. 2019-03-09 22:26:56

Further, this shows that the identity function is not even any sort of limit of logarithm functions.

## @Vasya 2019-03-08 22:15:59

Logically, $y=x$ is a straight line, $y=\log_b x$ is not (otherwise why would we call it non-linear function) so they cannot coincide for all $x$.

Suppose $y=\log_b x$ is a straight line the same as $y=x$ then for any two $x_1$ and $x_2$ such as $x_2=x_1+1$ we should have for the slope: $1=\frac{\log_b x_2-\log_b x_1}{x_2-x_1}=\log_b x_2-\log_b x_1=\log_b \frac{x_2}{x_1} \rightarrow \frac{x_2}{x_1}=b$ which leads to a contradiction ($\frac{4}{3}=b, \frac{5}{4}=b$).

## @Henning Makholm 2019-03-08 22:26:23

And why is $y=\log_b x$ not a straight line?

## @Vasya 2019-03-08 22:32:07

@HenningMakholm: because it does not have a constant slope (derivative will be $c\over x$ where $c$ is a constant but $x$ is obviously not)

## @Henning Makholm 2019-03-08 22:37:46

$\frac0x$ is a constant function on a useful subset of $\mathbb R$.

## @Vasya 2019-03-09 03:23:06

@HenningMakholm: we both know that $c \ne 0$ in this case, I was trying to explain it at the simplest level for the original poster.

## @Henning Makholm 2019-03-09 10:14:15

The OP was asking for an

argument, not for a "simplest level" that amounts to an unsupported assertion of the same thing he wanted a proof of.## @Vasya 2019-03-09 14:28:40

@HenningMakholm: Fair point, I expanded on my answer a little bit.

## @schomatis 2019-03-09 03:40:50

I'm expanding here the accepted answer by FredH in the way I interpreted it, putting it in layman's terms as much as possible (according to my very basic mathematical knowledge). I'm also drawing from other answers posted, so thanks everyone who took the time!

First, as suggested, instead of talking in terms of logarithms I'll rephrase the question as an exponentiation (which seems simpler to grasp). In that case we would be looking for a base $b$ that had an exponent that would be the same as its result:

$$ b^x=x $$

In this explanation I'll invert the terms calling the exponent the input and the result of the exponentiation the output (in the logarithm it's actually the other way around since it is the inverse function, but since we're talking about an identity function the relationship between the input and output is symmetrical).

An identity function, and hence a linear function, will have its output growing at the same rate as the input (called both $x$ here). Even if there's a particular $b$ and a particular $x$ that holds the equality (which there are, as shown in the examples of other answers), when $x$ starts growing, say, one unit at a time, in the left-hand side (LHS) it would mean multiplying the already $b^x$ by another $b$

$$ b^{x+1} = x + 1 \iff b^x * b = x + 1 $$

so the LHS would be expanding $b$ times (multiplication) while the output is always growing by a fixed constant of $1$ (addition).

I originally thought of the invalid logarithm base of $1$, but not even $1$ would work for every $x$, it would keep the LHS steady while the output changes. If $b$ is bigger than one, no matter how close to $1$ it is, repeatedly multiplying by it would cause the LHS to, at some point, start (and keep) growing in each iteration by more than just $1$, surpassing the pace of the output (which will

alwaysgrow at same rate). Worse yet, if $b$ is smaller than one it would mean that the LHS would start getting smaller (while the output grows).As succinctly expressed in the answers, the identity function, or any linear function for that matter, won't fit a logarithm no matter the chosen base, since it would be like trying to fit a multiplication into an addition.

## @fleablood 2019-03-08 22:07:06

If $b^k = k$ for all $k$ then

$(b^k)^m = b^{km}= k^m=km$ for all $k$ and $m$.

....

Actually the heck with it: $\log_b 1 = 0$ always and $1 \ne 0$.

Likewise $\log_b b = 1$ and presumably $b \ne 1$

## @FredH 2019-03-08 22:08:43

For a function to be a logarithm, it should satisfy the law of logarithms: $\log ab = \log a + \log b$, for $a,b \gt 0$. If it were the identity function, this would become $ab = a + b$, which clearly is not always true.

## @Eclipse Sun 2019-03-08 22:06:06

Note that $$\log_b x=x\iff b^x=x\iff b=\sqrt[x]{x}.$$ Since $\sqrt[x]{x}$ is not a constant function, the relation cannot hold for all $x$.

But it can be true for some particular $x$. For example $b=\sqrt{2}$ and we have $$\log_{\sqrt{2}}2=2.$$

## @Martin Hansen 2019-03-08 22:05:29

In general $$log_b a=c$$ is the same as $$b^c=a$$ so you can leave logs behind and focus on solutions to $$b^x=x$$