2017-01-02 21:05:49 8 Comments

I'm learning about angular moment and central forces, and in my syllabus I came across this formula:

How did they get 1 over r? I am familiar with the gradient, but I've never seen the gradient calculated for a central potential, so I think I'm a little bit confused here. I would have just thought that the magnitude of $F$ equals $-d(Uc)/dr$, but apparently a factor $1/r$ comes into play, and I don't know why.

Could someone help me?

### Related Questions

#### Sponsored Content

#### 2 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Curl of gradient of potential in electrostatic

**2017-06-07 07:23:15****Ananga Datta****151**View**2**Score**2**Answer- Tags: electrostatics potential differentiation

#### 2 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Adhesion vs Static Friction

**2018-11-23 22:47:41****Joshua Ronis****252**View**2**Score**2**Answer- Tags: forces rotational-dynamics friction adhesion

#### 2 Answered Questions

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Significance of centrifugal potential

**2017-10-06 18:22:50****Arnabesh Samadder****475**View**0**Score**1**Answer- Tags: classical-mechanics lagrangian-formalism reference-frames coordinate-systems centrifugal-force

#### 5 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] Inconsistency between two formulas for Gravitational Potential Energy that don't yield the same result

**2017-04-27 08:01:57****BLAZE****856**View**5**Score**5**Answer- Tags: newtonian-gravity potential potential-energy virial-theorem

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] How long does it take a rolling ball to stop?

**2017-04-28 04:34:05****jdphysics****1181**View**4**Score**1**Answer- Tags: newtonian-mechanics forces kinematics torque rotational-kinematics

#### 1 Answered Questions

### [SOLVED] How to get the gradient potential in polar coordinate

**2012-10-18 15:27:55****RRRR****2042**View**0**Score**1**Answer- Tags: homework-and-exercises differential-geometry coordinate-systems differentiation

## 1 comments

## @AHB 2017-01-02 21:09:12

In spherical coordinates, Gradient is calculated like that. It's derived from definition. And it's different from gradient in Cartesian coordinates. That's all.

See here

If you want the reason, David J.Griffith says:

Also,