By mark

2012-05-17 13:23:54 8 Comments

Apparently, I have completely misunderstood its semantics. I thought of something like this:

  1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.
  2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.
  3. The client triggers some functionality of MyCode.js, which in turn make requests to http://siteB, which should be fine, despite being cross-origin requests.

Well, I am wrong. It does not work like this at all. So, I have read Cross-origin resource sharing and attempted to read Cross-Origin Resource Sharing in w3c recommendation

One thing is sure - I still do not understand how am I supposed to use this header.

I have full control of both site A and site B. How do I enable the javascript code downloaded from the site A to access resources on the site B using this header?


I do not want to utilize JSONP.


@Alireza 2019-01-31 11:49:26

The Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header indicates whether the response can be shared with requesting code from the given origin.

Header type Response       header
Forbidden header name      no

A response that tells the browser to allow code from any origin to access a resource will include the following:

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

For more info, visit here....

@Juboraj Sarker 2019-01-20 04:35:59

Simply paste the following code in your web.config file.

Noted that, you have to paste the following code under <system.webServer> tag

     <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Origin" value="*" />  
     <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Headers" value="Content-Type" />  
     <add name="Access-Control-Allow-Methods" value="GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, OPTIONS" />  

@Dom 2018-01-28 18:47:01

Whenever I start thinking about CORS, my intuition about which site hosts the headers is incorrect, just as you described in your question. For me, it helps to think about the purpose of the same origin policy.

The purpose of the same origin policy is to protect you from malicious JavaScript on accessing private information you've chosen to share only with Without the same origin policy, JavaScript written by the authors of could make your browser make requests to, using your authentication cookies for In this way, could steal the secret information you share with

Sometimes you need to work cross domain, which is where CORS comes in. CORS relaxes the same origin policy for, using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to list other domains ( that are trusted to run JavaScript that can interact with

To understand which domain should serve the CORS headers, consider this. You visit, which contains some JavaScript that tries to make a cross domain request to It should be up to, not, to decide whether or not it sets CORS headers that relax the same origin policy allowing the JavaScript from to interact with it. If could set its own CORS headers allowing its own JavaScript access to, this would completely nullify the same origin policy.

I think the reason for my bad intuition is the point of view I have when developing a site. It's my site, with all my JavaScript, therefore it isn't doing anything malicious and it should be up to me to specify which other sites my JavaScript can interact with. When in fact I should be thinking which other sites JavaScript are trying to interact with my site and should I use CORS to allow them?

@peachykeen 2018-01-25 11:10:18

In Python I have been using the Flask-CORS library with great success. It makes dealing with CORS super easy and painless. I added some code from the library's documentation below.


$ pip install -U flask-cors

Simple example that allows CORS for all domains on all routes:

from flask import Flask
from flask_cors import CORS

app = Flask(__name__)

def helloWorld():
  return "Hello, cross-origin-world!"

For more specific examples see the documentation. I have used the simple example above to get around the CORS issue in an ionic application I am building that has to access a separate flask server.

@Dhaval Jardosh 2017-10-16 15:53:24

Using React and Axios, join proxy link to the URL and add header as shown below + Your API URL

Just by adding the Proxy link will work, but it can also throw error for No Access again. Hence better to add header as shown below.

axios.get(`[YOUR_API_URL]`,{headers: {'Access-Control-Allow-Origin': '*'}})
      .then(response => console.log(response:data);

@captainserious 2017-12-09 10:12:57

Please don't do this. Using a proxy link is like handing over user cookies to a middle-man. Should be illegal IMHO

@blvckasvp 2018-10-19 01:18:18

Thanks for sharing this! You saved my day. You think I can use this hack on production?

@Pmpr 2017-03-05 06:39:53

Question is a bit too old to answer, but I am posting this for any future reference to this question.

According to this Mozilla Developer Network article,

A resource makes a cross-origin HTTP request when it requests a resource from a different domain, or port than the one which the first resource itself serves.

enter image description here

An HTML page served from makes an <img> src request for
Many pages on the web today load resources like CSS stylesheets, images and scripts from separate domains (thus it should be cool).

Same-Origin Policy

For security reasons, browsers restrict cross-origin HTTP requests initiated from within scripts.
For example, XMLHttpRequest and Fetch follow the same-origin policy.
So, a web application using XMLHttpRequest or Fetch could only make HTTP requests to its own domain.

Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)

To improve web applications, developers asked browser vendors to allow cross-domain requests.

The Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism gives web servers cross-domain access controls, which enable secure cross-domain data transfers.
Modern browsers use CORS in an API container - such as XMLHttpRequest or Fetch - to mitigate risks of cross-origin HTTP requests.

How CORS works (Access-Control-Allow-Origin header)


The CORS standard describes new HTTP headers which provide browsers and servers a way to request remote URLs only when they have permission.

Although some validation and authorization can be performed by the server, it is generally the browser's responsibility to support these headers and honor the restrictions they impose.


  1. The browser sends the OPTIONS request with an Origin HTTP header.

    The value of this header is the domain that served the parent page. When a page from attempts to access a user's data in, the following request header would be sent to


  2. The server at may respond with:

    • An Access-Control-Allow-Origin (ACAO) header in its response indicating which origin sites are allowed.
      For example:


    • An error page if the server does not allow the cross-origin request

    • An Access-Control-Allow-Origin (ACAO) header with a wildcard that allows all domains:

      Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

@Subin C Poonamgode 2017-08-25 06:18:41

How to set none are allowed to acees some thing like Access-Control-Allow-Origin:null

@Subin C Poonamgode 2017-08-31 13:54:47

When I don't want to allow anyone to access my resources through CORS, what value should I set for Access-Control-Allow-Origin ? I mean the negation of Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *

@Pmpr 2017-08-31 13:56:52

Just dont set anything, for that purpose

@Maurizio Brioschi 2017-02-22 16:32:30

If you want just to test a cross domain application in which the browser blocks your request, then you can just open your browser in unsafe mode and test your application without changing your code and without making your code unsafe. From MAC OS you can do this from the terminal line:

open -a Google\ Chrome --args --disable-web-security --user-data-dir

@izik f 2017-02-06 08:19:11

i work with express 4 and node 7.4 and angular,I had the same problem me help this:
a) server side: in file app.js i give headers to all response like:

app.use(function(req, res, next) {  
      res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', req.headers.origin);
      res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");

this must have before all router.
I saw a lot of added this headers:

res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', true);
res.header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET,PUT,POST,DELETE');

but i dont need that,
b) client side: in send ajax you need add: "withCredentials: true," like:

     method: 'POST',
     url: 'url, 
     withCredentials: true,
     data : {}
        // code  
   }, function (response) {
         // code 

good luck.

@Melvin Guerrero 2017-01-18 15:30:06

If you are using PHP, try to add the following code at the beaning of the php file:

if you are using localhost, try this:

header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *");

if you are using external domains such as server, try this:


@suryadev 2016-11-28 02:39:37

For cross origin sharing, set header: 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*';

Php: header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');

Node: app.use('Access-Control-Allow-Origin':'*');

This will allow to share content for different domain.

@apsillers 2012-05-17 13:33:26

Access-Control-Allow-Origin is a CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) header.

When Site A tries to fetch content from Site B, Site B can send an Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to tell the browser that the content of this page is accessible to certain origins. (An origin is a domain, plus a scheme and port number.) By default, Site B's pages are not accessible to any other origin; using the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header opens a door for cross-origin access by specific requesting origins.

For each resource/page that Site B wants to make accessible to Site A, Site B should serve its pages with the response header:


Modern browsers will not block cross-domain requests outright. If Site A requests a page from Site B, the browser will actually fetch the requested page on the network level and check if the response headers list Site A as a permitted requester domain. If Site B has not indicated that Site A is allowed to access this page, the browser will trigger the XMLHttpRequest's error event and deny the response data to the requesting JavaScript code.

Non-simple requests

What happens on the network level can be slightly more complex than explained above. If the request is a "non-simple" request, the browser first sends a data-less "preflight" OPTIONS request, to verify that the server will accept the request. A request is non-simple when either (or both):

  • using an HTTP verb other than GET or POST (e.g. PUT, DELETE)
  • using non-simple request headers; the only simple requests headers are:
    • Accept
    • Accept-Language
    • Content-Language
    • Content-Type (this is only simple when its value is application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain)

If the server responds to the OPTIONS preflight with appropriate response headers (Access-Control-Allow-Headers for non-simple headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods for non-simple verbs) that match the non-simple verb and/or non-simple headers, then the browser sends the actual request.

Supposing that Site A wants to send a PUT request for /somePage, with a non-simple Content-Type value of application/json, the browser would first send a preflight request:

OPTIONS /somePage HTTP/1.1
Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type

Note that Access-Control-Request-Method and Access-Control-Request-Headers are added by the browser automatically; you do not need to add them. This OPTIONS preflight gets the successful response headers:

Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type

When sending the actual request (after preflight is done), the behavior is identical to how a simple request is handled. In other words, a non-simple request whose preflight is successful is treated the same as a simple request (i.e., the server must still send Access-Control-Allow-Origin again for the actual response).

The browsers sends the actual request:

PUT /somePage HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json

{ "myRequestContent": "JSON is so great" }

And the server sends back an Access-Control-Allow-Origin, just as it would for a simple request:


See Understanding XMLHttpRequest over CORS for a little more information about non-simple requests.

@mark 2012-05-17 13:36:13

But MyCode.js cannot reach for site B in the first place! How will this header arrive at the client? BTW, kudos for the light life glider in the avatar.

@apsillers 2012-05-17 13:41:15

I edited with clarification: the browser actually does perform a network fetch on site B to check the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, but it might not provide the response to the JS code on site A if the header doesn't allow site A to have it. (P.S. Thanks :) )

@mark 2012-05-17 14:18:22

Indeed, I do not see any record of the download in Fiddler, unless the cross-origin request is approved. Interesting...

@Jwan622 2015-07-12 12:06:07

So why can my browser make an HTTP get request when I type it in the URL and retrieve JSON data but my javascript client cannot?

@apsillers 2015-07-12 17:55:41

@Jwan622 A fundamental "why?" question like that is probably out of scope for this particular answer, which is just about rules & mechanics. Basically, the browser allows you, the human sitting at the computer, see any resource from any origin. It disallows scripts (which could be written by anyone) from reading resources from origins that are different from the origin of the page running the script. Some related questions are and What is the threat model for the same origin policy?

@Zsolti 2016-09-09 19:59:55

In case of using an authentication, Access-Control-Allow-Origin does not accept the * in some browsers (FF and Chrome AFAIK). So in this case you have to specify the value from the Origin header. Hope that this will help someone.

@apsillers 2016-09-09 20:04:38

@Zsolti That is indeed spec-compliant behavior ("The string "*" cannot be used for a resource that supports credentials."). See also Cannot use wildcard in Access-Control-Allow-Origin when credentials flag is true

@Dan Dascalescu 2016-10-22 02:23:47 adds that "​The second domain determines whether or not to serve the content by validating the first domain, which is included as part of the request. The second domain then returns either the content or an error message back to the browser, bypassing the first domain entirely."

@Keith John Hutchison 2016-12-22 00:13:47

This worked for me in c# System.Net.Http.HttpResponseMessage response = new HttpResponseMessage(); response.Headers.Add("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "domain/page.html");

@NAVIN 2018-10-29 07:52:17

So this mean, if site A is not allowed by site B, and site B API does DB operations and input validation, so this will all be done and then request will be rejected at browser end, even though everything is done.

@NAVIN 2018-10-29 07:53:10

How preFlight request escapes all input validations and db calls?

@apsillers 2018-10-29 12:10:06

@NAVIN "this will all be done and then request will be rejected at browser end" -- if I understand you, this is exactly what a preflight prevents. First, the browser sends a preflight OPTIONS, and it waits ito send the real request that will trigger some action on the server. If the server does not say, "Yes, send the real request," by sending appropriate an CORS response, then the browser will not send the real request.

@Ashfaque Rifaye 2019-03-03 14:17:16

I have few doubts regarding CORS: 1. So, if the sever API that we are trying to access the response does not enable CORS Filter access, do Chrome Plugins can work for by-passing? 2. What should I in my production environment for enabling this CORS filter? For Ex. If I am trying to access an API like, the Facebook API to login/ Google API to sign In to my webpage, how can these filter work, as they might have restricted the cross-domain access. So, in that case how can these filter by-pass done?

@apsillers 2019-03-03 15:55:38

@Ashfaque (1) Chrome Extensions may request permission to access specific origins in ways that normal web pages cannot. (2) Login APIs like OAuth don't use XHR/Ajax. They actually redirect the top-level page to some other page like in a way that doesn't cause a cross-origin request.

@Malvoz 2019-06-07 20:21:31

For completeness, to anyone that is using access-control-allow-origin dynamically (changing the URL value based on the requesting origin) instead of *, you must also include the header Vary: Origin. See

@Wayne Ye 2014-01-23 13:54:54

Cross-Origin Request Sharing - CORS (A.K.A. Cross-Domain AJAX request) is an issue that most web developers might encounter, according to Same-Origin-Policy, browsers restrict client JavaScript in a security sandbox, usually JS cannot directly communicate with a remote server from a different domain. In the past developers created many tricky ways to achieve Cross-Domain resource request, most commonly using ways are:

  1. Use Flash/Silverlight or server side as a "proxy" to communicate with remote.
  2. JSON With Padding (JSONP).
  3. Embeds remote server in an iframe and communicate through fragment or, refer here.

Those tricky ways have more or less some issues, for example JSONP might result in security hole if developers simply "eval" it, and #3 above, although it works, both domains should build strict contract between each other, it neither flexible nor elegant IMHO:)

W3C had introduced Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) as a standard solution to provide a safe, flexible and a recommended standard way to solve this issue.

The Mechanism

From a high level we can simply deem CORS is a contract between client AJAX call from domain A and a page hosted on domain B, a typical Cross-Origin request/response would be:

DomainA AJAX request headers

User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0
Accept text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
Accept-Language en-us;
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Keep-Alive 115

DomainB response headers

Cache-Control private
Content-Type application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length 87
Proxy-Connection Keep-Alive
Connection Keep-Alive

The blue parts I marked above were the kernal facts, "Origin" request header "indicates where the cross-origin request or preflight request originates from", the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" response header indicates this page allows remote request from DomainA (if the value is * indicate allows remote requests from any domain).

As I mentioned above, W3 recommended browser to implement a "preflight request" before submiting the actually Cross-Origin HTTP request, in a nutshell it is an HTTP OPTIONS request:


If foo.aspx supports OPTIONS HTTP verb, it might return response like below:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2011 15:38:19 GMT
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, OPTIONS, HEAD
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: X-Requested-With
Access-Control-Max-Age: 1728000
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: application/json

Only if the response contains "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" AND its value is "*" or contain the domain who submitted the CORS request, by satisfying this mandtory condition browser will submit the actual Cross-Domain request, and cache the result in "Preflight-Result-Cache".

I blogged about CORS three years ago: AJAX Cross-Origin HTTP request

@LuqJensen 2017-01-08 21:06:12

This answer made me realize why i was suddenly getting an issue without using this header for POST and GET requests. I had accidently opened the index.html file directly from disk, so the URL the client was accessing on node.js was thought to be cross-domain, while it was simply running on localhost. Accessing via the URL (as one would usually do) "solved" my issue...

@Si8 2017-03-31 01:47:01

Would a domain in an external network able to communite with a domain on an internal network?

@OsamaBinLogin 2016-02-27 01:37:43

1. A client downloads javascript code MyCode.js from http://siteA - the origin.

The code that does the downloading - your html script tag or xhr from javascript or whatever - came from, let's say, http://siteZ. And, when the browser requests MyCode.js, it sends an Origin: header saying "Origin: http://siteZ", because it can see that you're requesting to siteA and siteZ != siteA. (You cannot stop or interfere with this.)

2. The response header of MyCode.js contains Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://siteB, which I thought meant that MyCode.js was allowed to make cross-origin references to the site B.

no. It means, Only siteB is allowed to do this request. So your request for MyCode.js from siteZ gets an error instead, and the browser typically gives you nothing. But if you make your server return A-C-A-O: siteZ instead, you'll get MyCode.js . Or if it sends '*', that'll work, that'll let everybody in. Or if the server always sends the string from the Origin: header... but... for security, if you're afraid of hackers, your server should only allow origins on a shortlist, that are allowed to make those requests.

Then, MyCode.js comes from siteA. When it makes requests to siteB, they are all cross-origin, the browser sends Origin: siteA, and siteB has to take the siteA, recognize it's on the short list of allowed requesters, and send back A-C-A-O: siteA. Only then will the browser let your script get the result of those requests.

Related Questions

Sponsored Content

16 Answered Questions

86 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] How do JavaScript closures work?

20 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Response to preflight request doesn't pass access control check

25 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] How does JavaScript .prototype work?

28 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Access-Control-Allow-Origin Multiple Origin Domains?

14 Answered Questions

11 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' - Node / Apache Port Issue

14 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] How does data binding work in AngularJS?

Sponsored Content