#### [SOLVED] Accessing the index in 'for' loops?

How do I access the index in a `for` loop like the following?

``````ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
for i in ints:
print('item #{} = {}'.format(???, i))
``````

I want to get this output:

``````item #1 = 8
item #2 = 23
item #3 = 45
item #4 = 12
item #5 = 78
``````

When I loop through it using a `for` loop, how do I access the loop index, from 1 to 5 in this case? #### @Ankur Kothari 2018-06-04 02:10:17

If I were to iterate `nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` I would do

``````for i, num in enumerate(nums, start=1):
print(i, num)
``````

Or get the length as `l = len(nums)`

``````for i in range(l):
print(i+1, nums[i])
`````` #### @Amar Kumar 2020-04-18 20:25:15

``````arr = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
i = 0
while i<len(arr):
print("Item ",i+1," = ",arr[i])
i +=1
``````

Output:  # Here's what you get when you're accessing index in `for` loops:

`for i in enumerate(items): print(i)`

``````items = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]

for i in enumerate(items):
print("index/value", i)
``````

Result:

``````# index/value (0, 8)
# index/value (1, 23)
# index/value (2, 45)
# index/value (3, 12)
# index/value (4, 78)
``````

`for i, val in enumerate(items): print(i, val)`

``````items = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]

for i, val in enumerate(items):
print("index", i, "for value", val)
``````

Result:

``````# index 0 for value 8
# index 1 for value 23
# index 2 for value 45
# index 3 for value 12
# index 4 for value 78
``````

`for i, val in enumerate(items): print(i)`

``````items = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]

for i, val in enumerate(items):
print("index", i)
``````

Result:

``````# index 0
# index 1
# index 2
# index 3
# index 4
`````` #### @DrM 2018-08-15 17:52:50

In your question, you write "how do I access the loop index, from 1 to 5 in this case?"

However, the index for a list runs from zero. So, then we need to know if what you actually want is the index and item for each item in a list, or whether you really want numbers starting from 1. Fortunately, in Python, it is easy to do either or both.

First, to clarify, the `enumerate` function iteratively returns the index and corresponding item for each item in a list.

``````alist = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

for n, a in enumerate(alist):
print("%d %d" % (n, a))
``````

The output for the above is then,

``````0 1
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
``````

Notice that the index runs from 0. This kind of indexing is common among modern programming languages including Python and C.

If you want your loop to span a part of the list, you can use the standard Python syntax for a part of the list. For example, to loop from the second item in a list up to but not including the last item, you could use

``````for n, a in enumerate(alist[1:-1]):
print("%d %d" % (n, a))
``````

Note that once again, the output index runs from 0,

``````0 2
1 3
2 4
``````

That brings us to the `start=n` switch for `enumerate()`. This simply offsets the index, you can equivalently simply add a number to the index inside the loop.

``````for n, a in enumerate(alist, start=1):
print("%d %d" % (n, a))
``````

for which the output is

``````1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
`````` #### @RIshu 2018-06-10 03:59:43

If there is no duplicate value in the list:

``````for i in ints:
indx = ints.index(i)
print(i, indx)
`````` #### @Stam Kaly 2018-12-19 14:05:25

Note that the first option should not be used, since it only works correctly only when each item in the sequence is unique. #### @Boris 2019-04-20 10:24:43

First option is O(n²), a terrible idea. If your list is 1000 elements long, it'll take literally a 1000 times longer than using `enumerate`. You should delete this answer. #### @thinker007 2012-05-05 07:10:07

Loop counter iteration

The current idiom for looping over the indices makes use of the built-in `range` function:

``````for i in range(len(sequence)):
# work with index i
``````

Looping over both elements and indices can be achieved either by the old idiom or by using the new `zip` built-in function:

``````for i in range(len(sequence)):
e = sequence[i]
# work with index i and element e
``````

or

``````for i, e in zip(range(len(sequence)), sequence):
# work with index i and element e
`````` This won't work for iterating through generators. Just use enumerate(). #### @TankorSmash 2016-08-15 18:12:50

Nowadays, the current idiom is enumerate, not the range call. #### @Jean-François Fabre 2019-04-20 12:54:35

and it's the same as the older answer: stackoverflow.com/a/522576/6451573 #### @A.J. 2014-05-27 10:04:52

It's pretty simple to start it from `1` other than `0`:

``````for index, item in enumerate(iterable, start=1):
print index, item
``````

## Note

Important hint, though a little misleading since `index` will be a `tuple` `(idx, item)` here. Good to go. #### @Antti Haapala 2016-03-18 09:18:40

The question was about list indexes; since they start from 0 there is little point in starting from other number since the indexes would be wrong (yes, the OP said it wrong in the question as well). Otherwise, calling the variable that is tuple of `index, item` just `index` is very misleading, as you noted. Just use `for index, item in enumerate(ints)`. #### @hygull 2018-01-02 11:31:38

Better is to enclose index inside parenthesis pairs as (index), it will work on both the Python versions 2 and 3. #### @pushkin 2018-11-30 18:24:48

@AnttiHaapala The reason, I presume, is that the question's expected output starts at index 1 instead 0 #### @PyRsquared 2018-05-30 21:34:22

You can use the `index` method

``````ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
inds = [ints.index(i) for i in ints]
``````

EDIT Highlighted in the comment that this method doesn’t work if there are duplicates in `ints`, the method below should work for any values in `ints`:

``````ints = [8, 8, 8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
inds = [tup for tup in enumerate(ints)]
``````

Or alternatively

``````ints = [8, 8, 8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
inds = [tup for tup in enumerate(ints)]
``````

if you want to get both the index and the value in `ints` as a list of tuples.

It uses the method of `enumerate` in the selected answer to this question, but with list comprehension, making it faster with less code. #### @Sumit Kumar 2018-04-24 10:45:29

This serves the purpose well enough:

``````list1 = [10, 'sumit', 43.21, 'kumar', '43', 'test', 3]
for x in list1:
print('index:', list1.index(x), 'value:', x)
`````` #### @Peter Szoldan 2018-05-15 17:17:59

This will break down if there are repeated elements in the list as `index()` will search for the first occurrence of `x`, not mentioning the O( n^2 ) time required to look up each element. #### @Sumit Kumar 2018-06-06 10:16:34

totally agreed that it won't work for duplicate elements in the list. afterall I'm also learning python. #### @lola 2018-04-24 10:53:56

To print tuple of (index, value) in list comprehension using a `for` loop:

``````ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
print [(i,ints[i]) for i in range(len(ints))]
``````

Output:

``````[(0, 8), (1, 23), (2, 45), (3, 12), (4, 78)]
`````` # Using a for loop, how do I access the loop index, from 1 to 5 in this case?

Use `enumerate` to get the index with the element as you iterate:

``````for index, item in enumerate(items):
print(index, item)
``````

And note that Python's indexes start at zero, so you would get 0 to 4 with the above. If you want the count, 1 to 5, do this:

``````for count, item in enumerate(items, start=1):
print(count, item)
``````

# Unidiomatic control flow

What you are asking for is the Pythonic equivalent of the following, which is the algorithm most programmers of lower-level languages would use:

``````index = 0            # Python's indexing starts at zero
for item in items:   # Python's for loops are a "for each" loop
print(index, item)
index += 1
``````

Or in languages that do not have a for-each loop:

``````index = 0
while index < len(items):
print(index, items[index])
index += 1
``````

or sometimes more commonly (but unidiomatically) found in Python:

``````for index in range(len(items)):
print(index, items[index])
``````

# Use the Enumerate Function

Python's `enumerate` function reduces the visual clutter by hiding the accounting for the indexes, and encapsulating the iterable into another iterable (an `enumerate` object) that yields a two-item tuple of the index and the item that the original iterable would provide. That looks like this:

``````for index, item in enumerate(items, start=0):   # default is zero
print(index, item)
``````

This code sample is fairly well the canonical example of the difference between code that is idiomatic of Python and code that is not. Idiomatic code is sophisticated (but not complicated) Python, written in the way that it was intended to be used. Idiomatic code is expected by the designers of the language, which means that usually this code is not just more readable, but also more efficient.

## Getting a count

Even if you don't need indexes as you go, but you need a count of the iterations (sometimes desirable) you can start with `1` and the final number will be your count.

``````for count, item in enumerate(items, start=1):   # default is zero
print(item)

print('there were {0} items printed'.format(count))
``````

The count seems to be more what you intend to ask for (as opposed to index) when you said you wanted from 1 to 5.

## Breaking it down - a step by step explanation

To break these examples down, say we have a list of items that we want to iterate over with an index:

``````items = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']
``````

Now we pass this iterable to enumerate, creating an enumerate object:

``````enumerate_object = enumerate(items) # the enumerate object
``````

We can pull the first item out of this iterable that we would get in a loop with the `next` function:

``````iteration = next(enumerate_object) # first iteration from enumerate
print(iteration)
``````

And we see we get a tuple of `0`, the first index, and `'a'`, the first item:

``````(0, 'a')
``````

we can use what is referred to as "sequence unpacking" to extract the elements from this two-tuple:

``````index, item = iteration
#   0,  'a' = (0, 'a') # essentially this.
``````

and when we inspect `index`, we find it refers to the first index, 0, and `item` refers to the first item, `'a'`.

``````>>> print(index)
0
>>> print(item)
a
``````

# Conclusion

• Python indexes start at zero
• To get these indexes from an iterable as you iterate over it, use the enumerate function
• Using enumerate in the idiomatic way (along with tuple unpacking) creates code that is more readable and maintainable:

So do this:

``````for index, item in enumerate(items, start=0):   # Python indexes start at zero
print(index, item)
`````` #### @Bergi 2020-02-22 15:36:14

Does the "Getting a count" example work when `items` is empty? #### @user12379095 2020-05-15 15:51:40

I am sending data using ajax to Django views as an array in the form of two values in a variable legData with values as `[1406, 1409]`. If I print to the console using `print(legData)`, the output is [1406,1409]. However, if I try to parse the individual values of the list like `for idx, xLeg in enumerate(legData):` `print(idx, xLeg)`, it gets me an output of individual integers such as [, 1, 4, 0, 6, and so on against the indices 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 etc. (yes, the square brackets & comma are also being output as if they were part of the data itself). What is going wrong here? #### @Aaron Hall 2020-05-15 23:01:42

@user12379095 you probably have the data in the wrong type (a string) and you need to convert it to an actual list of numbers instead of a string. That is somewhat off topic here, please delete your comment and flag mine to be deleted as no longer needed when you see this. #### @Charitoo 2017-08-15 02:17:41

As is the norm in Python there are several ways to do this. In all examples assume: `lst = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`

## 1. Using enumerate (considered most idiomatic)

``````for index, element in enumerate(lst):
# do the things that need doing here
``````

This is also the safest option in my opinion because the chance of going into infinite recursion has been eliminated. Both the item and its index are held in variables and there is no need to write any further code to access the item.

## 2. Creating a variable to hold the index (using `for`)

``````for index in range(len(lst)):   # or xrange
# you will have to write extra code to get the element
``````

## 3. Creating a variable to hold the index (using `while`)

``````index = 0
while index < len(lst):
# you will have to write extra code to get the element
index += 1  # escape infinite recursion
``````

## 4. There is always another way

As explained before, there are other ways to do this that have not been explained here and they may even apply more in other situations. e.g using `itertools.chain` with for. It handles nested loops better than the other examples. #### @Ashok Kumar Jayaraman 2018-02-07 14:04:10

You can also try this:

``````data = ['itemA.ABC', 'itemB.defg', 'itemC.drug', 'itemD.ashok']
x = []
for (i, item) in enumerate(data):
a = (i, str(item).split('.'))
x.append(a)
for index, value in x:
print(index, value)
``````

The output is

``````0 ['itemA', 'ABC']
1 ['itemB', 'defg']
2 ['itemC', 'drug']
3 ['itemD', 'ashok']
`````` #### @Anurag Misra 2017-08-24 06:15:31

Best solution for this problem is use enumerate in-build python function.
enumerate return tuple
first value is index
second value is element of array at that index

``````In : ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]

In : for idx, val in enumerate(ints):
...:         print(idx, val)
...:
(0, 8)
(1, 23)
(2, 45)
(3, 12)
(4, 78)
`````` #### @Andriy Ivaneyko 2016-08-04 09:49:50

The fastest way to access indexes of list within loop in Python 2.7 is to use the range method for small lists and enumerate method for medium and huge size lists.

Please see different approaches which can be used to iterate over list and access index value and their performance metrics (which I suppose would be useful for you) in code samples below:

``````from timeit import timeit

# Using range
def range_loop(iterable):
for i in range(len(iterable)):
1 + iterable[i]

# Using xrange
def xrange_loop(iterable):
for i in xrange(len(iterable)):
1 + iterable[i]

# Using enumerate
def enumerate_loop(iterable):
for i, val in enumerate(iterable):
1 + val

# Manual indexing
def manual_indexing_loop(iterable):
index = 0
for item in iterable:
1 + item
index += 1
``````

See performance metrics for each method below:

``````from timeit import timeit

def measure(l, number=10000):
print "Measure speed for list with %d items" % len(l)
print "xrange: ", timeit(lambda :xrange_loop(l), number=number)
print "range: ", timeit(lambda :range_loop(l), number=number)
print "enumerate: ", timeit(lambda :enumerate_loop(l), number=number)
print "manual_indexing: ", timeit(lambda :manual_indexing_loop(l), number=number)

measure(range(1000))
# Measure speed for list with 1000 items
# xrange:  0.758321046829
# range:  0.701184988022
# enumerate:  0.724966049194
# manual_indexing:  0.894635915756

measure(range(10000))
# Measure speed for list with 100000 items
# xrange:  81.4756360054
# range:  75.0172479153
# enumerate:  74.687623024
# manual_indexing:  91.6308541298

measure(range(10000000), number=100)
# Measure speed for list with 10000000 items
# xrange:  82.267786026
# range:  84.0493988991
# enumerate:  78.0344707966
# manual_indexing:  95.0491430759
``````

As the result, using `range` method is the fastest one up to list with 1000 items. For list with size > 10 000 items `enumerate` is the winner. #### @user4805123 2017-03-04 00:08:47

"readability counts" The speed difference in the small <1000 range is insignificant. It is 3% slower on an already small time metric. #### @Georgy 2019-05-22 14:20:17 #### @Mike Hordecki 2009-02-06 22:52:36

Using an additional state variable, such as an index variable (which you would normally use in languages such as C or PHP), is considered non-pythonic.

The better option is to use the built-in function `enumerate()`, available in both Python 2 and 3:

``````for idx, val in enumerate(ints):
print(idx, val)
``````

Check out PEP 279 for more. #### @clozach 2018-03-31 22:16:51

As Aaron points out below, use start=1 if you want to get 1-5 instead of 0-4. #### @TheRealChx101 2019-10-17 23:03:57

Does `enumerate` not incur another overhead? #### @Błotosmętek 2020-02-07 12:18:42

@TheRealChx101 according to my tests (Python 3.6.3) the difference is negligible and sometimes even in favour of `enumerate`. #### @Liam 2015-05-25 15:26:58

You can do it with this code:

``````ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
index = 0

for value in (ints):
index +=1
print index, value
``````

Use this code if you need to reset the index value at the end of the loop:

``````ints = [8, 23, 45, 12, 78]
index = 0

for value in (ints):
index +=1
print index, value
if index >= len(ints)-1:
index = 0
`````` #### @ytpillai 2015-05-25 15:08:34

First of all, the indexes will be from 0 to 4. Programming languages start counting from 0; don't forget that or you will come across an index out of bounds exception. All you need in the for loop is a variable counting from 0 to 4 like so:

``````for x in range(0, 5):
``````

Keep in mind that I wrote 0 to 5 because the loop stops one number before the max. :)

To get the value of an index use

``````list[index]
`````` #### @Charlie Martin 2009-02-06 22:52:06

Old fashioned way:

``````for ix in range(len(ints)):
print ints[ix]
``````

List comprehension:

``````[ (ix, ints[ix]) for ix in range(len(ints))]

>>> ints
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
>>> for ix in range(len(ints)): print ints[ix]
...
1
2
3
4
5
>>> [ (ix, ints[ix]) for ix in range(len(ints))]
[(0, 1), (1, 2), (2, 3), (3, 4), (4, 5)]
>>> lc = [ (ix, ints[ix]) for ix in range(len(ints))]
>>> for tup in lc:
...     print tup
...
(0, 1)
(1, 2)
(2, 3)
(3, 4)
(4, 5)
>>>
`````` #### @Valor Naram 2018-07-29 20:57:41

This is not wrong and is used in C/C++ and others. It's considered as non-pythonic, but can also be used in python. Like simple solutions that break it down to the source :+ #### @Valor Naram 2018-07-30 13:51:08

Some python extremists would say, don't do this. But I said it only to indicate that there is more than one possible way #### @David Hanak 2009-02-06 22:49:23

``````for i in range(len(ints)):
print i, ints[i]
`````` #### @Ben Blank 2009-02-06 22:52:56

That should probably be `xrange` for pre-3.0. #### @saulspatz 2015-08-01 21:28:53 #### @januarvs 2017-03-15 06:31:21

For Python 2.3 above, use enumerate built-in function since it is more Pythonic. Enumerate is not always better - it depends on the requirements of the application. In my current situation the relationships between the object lengths is meaningful to my application. Although I started out using enumerate, I switched to this approach to avoid having to write logic to select which object to enumerate. #### @chepner 2017-09-15 23:15:20

@adg I don't see how avoid `enumerate` saves any logic; you still have to select which object to index with `i`, no? #### @Graham 2018-12-23 16:33:25

@chepner If one is iterating through multiple lists, using `range` may make sense. Though `zip` is probably more Pythonic for these cases, so using `range` would still be a premature optimization, as other comments mention. #### @naoki fujita 2019-05-07 15:36:47

This representation is useful when I use numba or cython.

### [SOLVED] Looping through the content of a file in Bash

• 2009-10-05 17:52:54
• Peter Mortensen
• 1609208 View
• 1386 Score
• Tags:   linux bash loops unix io

### [SOLVED] Finding the index of an item in a list

• 2008-10-07 01:39:38
• Eugene M
• 3870459 View
• 3167 Score
• Tags:   python list indexing

### [SOLVED] How to remove an element from a list by index

• 2009-03-09 18:16:11
• Joan Venge
• 2612613 View
• 1502 Score