By Andrew

2018-08-16 21:19:17 8 Comments

The Ubuntu man page for apt-key includes the following note regarding apt-key add:

Note: Instead of using this command a keyring should be placed directly in the /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ directory with a descriptive name and either "gpg" or "asc" as file extension.

I don't think I've ever seen this advice anywhere else. Most projects that host their own repositories say to download their key file and add it with apt-key.

  1. What is the motivation behind this advice?
  2. Is this an Ubuntu-ism, or does it apply to any APT-based distro?


@JdeBP 2018-08-17 09:18:03

Those projects have outdated instructions. I know this because I publish a Debian repository and I updated my instructions when I found out about the changes in Debian 9 APT. Indeed, this part of the manual is now out of date, as it is the wrong directory.

This is not really to do with .d directories and more to do with preventing a cross-site vulnerability in APT. The older system used separate keyring files for convenience, but this is now a necessity for security; your security.

This is the vulnerability. Consider two repository publishers, A and B. In the world of Debian 8 and before, both publishers' keys went in the single global keyring on users' machines. If publisher A could somehow arrange to supplant the repository WWW site of publisher B, then A could publish subversive packages, signed with A's own key, which APT would happily accept and install. A's key is, after all, trusted globally for all repositories.

The mitigation is for users to use separate keyrings for individual publishers, and to reference those keyrings with individual Signed-By settings in their repository definitions. Specifically, publisher A's key is only used in the Signed-By of repository A and publisher B's key is only used in the Signed-By of repository B. This way, if publisher A supplants publisher B's repository, APT will not accept the subversive packages from it since they and the repository are signed by publisher A's key not by publisher B's.

The /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d mechanism at hand is an older Poor Man's somewhat flawed halfway house towards this, from back in 2005 or so, that is not quite good enough. It sets up the keyring in a separate file, so that it can be packaged up and just installed in one step by a package manager (or downloaded with fetch/curl/wget) as any other file. (The package manager handles preventing publisher A's special this-is-my-repository-keyring package from installing over publisher B's, in the normal way that it handles file conflicts between packages in general.) But it still adds it to the set of keys that is globally trusted for all repositories. The full mechanism that exists now uses separate, not globally trusted, keyring files in /usr/share/keyrings/.

My instructions are already there. ☺ There are moves afoot to move Debian's own repositories to this mechanism, so that they no longer use globally trusted keys either. You might want to have a word with those "most projects" that you found. After all, they are currently instructing you to hand over global access to APT on your machine to them.

Further reading

@sourcejedi 2018-08-17 12:30:27

apt-key del takes the keyid, which is a meaningless hash of the key.

It is simpler if you can uninstall keys using a meaningful name... like a filename.

As JdeBP says, this works nicely with trusted key files that are installed as part of a debian package. I think it can also be nicer when you've manually installed a key file.

In the new mechanism which is currently in "initial testing", this is further simplified. You only have to remove/disable one thing: the repository (in sources.list / sources.list.d). That will automatically stop allowing the key configured for that repo (unless it was also used by another repo).

I don't know how to take advantage of the new mechanism for security. I just assume that I need to trust someone if I use their package. The package install process is still running as root :-).

Related Questions

Sponsored Content

2 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Unable to add gpg key with apt-key behind a proxy

  • 2017-04-25 15:07:22
  • Anto
  • 25384 View
  • 22 Score
  • 2 Answer
  • Tags:   debian apt proxy gpg

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] why does apt choose lower version of a package?

  • 2018-01-01 04:57:03
  • Wang
  • 39 View
  • 0 Score
  • 1 Answer
  • Tags:   apt

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] sudo add-apt-key: command not found - Deepin 16.4

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Is `add-apt-repository` safe against a malicious network ("MITM")?

  • 2017-06-02 15:16:23
  • sourcejedi
  • 212 View
  • 1 Score
  • 1 Answer
  • Tags:   ubuntu security apt

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] apt-key: command not found

2 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Why is apt-get the norm instead of apt?

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] How do I get the man page for "apt upgrade"?

0 Answered Questions

Why do the outputs of those apt invocations differ?

  • 2016-12-19 20:03:52
  • Max Ried
  • 28 View
  • 3 Score
  • 0 Answer
  • Tags:   apt

1 Answered Questions

[SOLVED] Why does apt-get think packages "are no longer required"

  • 2015-05-11 00:35:05
  • Milliways
  • 1778 View
  • 6 Score
  • 1 Answer
  • Tags:   apt

Sponsored Content